สมัครสมาชิก เข้าสู่การทำงาน รายงาน รายงาน CCANET
ผู้แต่ง : Natthaphon Piyasatukit (nattpi@kku.ac.th)
ผู้แต่งร่วม : Bowornsilp Chowchuen (bowcho@kku.ac.th)
ภายใต้โครงการ :
ติดต่อ หลิน ณัฏฐาพร ปิยะสาธุกิจ

Tel: 0805840966   Fax:
Nplinn@hotmail.com

Mock Abstract

 

The Assessment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency after Primary Palatoplasty in 10-19 years old Cleft Palate Children : Compare standard assessment

Natthaphon Piyasatukit**, Bowornsilp Chowchuen MD, MBA**,  Benjamas Prathanee PhD*

* Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

** Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Cleft Palate and

Craniofacial Center, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Cleft palate children 20-30% will experience Velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI). VPI results from a malfunctioning of the muscular valve made up of the soft palate and the lateral and posterior pharyngeal walls. Velopharyngeal dysfunction can usually be diagnosed by the speech/language pathologist based on speed assessment.There multiple modalities are available to confirm the diagnosis and the planning of operations such as nasendoscopy, multiplanar-videofluroscopy, pressure-flow measurements(Aerodynamic) and fMRI, Spectography, Accelerometry for a research. This wide variation of investigative tools is critical importance if a surgeon is utilising to evaluate the pattern of closure deficiency and plan their operative intervention appropriately.

Objective:to evalution the accuracy rate of nasendoscopy and multiplanar-videofluroscopy in the assessment of VPI. 

Methods: A Cross-sectional study of N…consecutive symdromic and non-syndromic cleft palates with/or without cleft lips, born Between ..... , who underwent primary palatoplasty at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand.

Demographic data that were recorded includes: patients with cleft types, age at palatoplasty, operating surgeons ,surgical palatal repair techniques, Speech assessing and treating articulation disorders by speech/language pathologist, Imaging procedures for assessing VPI, age at evaluation, Palatal fistular, and Neuromuscular disfunction associate genetic anomalies.

 

Results: XXX consecutive patients. There were dermographic data…. .The rate of VPI was xx.x% (xx out of xx patients) of cleft palates underwent primary palatoplasty at Srinagarind Hospital that diaganosis making form speed assessment ,nasendoscopy and multiplanar-videofluroscopy. The evalution of The acccureacy rate of nasendoscopy( xx.x%) and multiplanar-videofluroscopy(xx.x%) when comparison with speed assessment by speech/language pathologist. (xx%),(xx%)when comparison pressure-flow measurements. (xx%),(xx%)when comparison with fMRI.

 

Conclusions: The rate of VPI and the accuracy rate of the nasendoscopy and multiplanar-videofluroscopy was comparable to results from other standard tools to confirm the diagnosis and the planning of operations of cleft palate patients who underwent primary palatoplasty during previous rounds of our management protocol.

 

Key words: Velopharyngeal incompetence; VPI; Assessment;


Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with cleft palate with/without cleft lip who underwent primary palatoplasty

 

Characteristics

Number

 

 
 

Number of patients

Gender

     Male

     Female

Comorbidity &Associate Syndrome

     VCD

     G-6-PD deficiency

     Amniotic band constriction

     Club feet

     Etc.

Age at time of evaluation( Mean)

Age at palatoplasty (Mean)

Age range for palatoplasty

     <12 months

     12-18 months

     >18 months

Cleft types

    Veau 1

    Veau 2

    Veau 3

    Veau 4

Type of palatoplasty

     Two-flap palatoplasty

     Secondary palatal repair

Fistula closure

Residual fistula at time of

evaluation

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Data collection

 

Investigation

Number

 

 

Speech assessing and treating articulation disorders by speech/language pathologist (yes/no)

   

Speech assessing parameter of resonance

     -1 = Hyponasality

      0 = normal

     +1= mild hypernasality

     +2 = moderate hypernasality

     +3 = severe hypernasality

 

Procedures for assessing

     Nasendoscopy

          VP gap size(mean)

          VPI (yes/no)

               Sagittal diastasis

               Transverse intact

     Videofluroscopy(yes/no)

         VP gap size(mean)

          VPI (yes/no)

               Coronal

               Sagittal

               Circular

               Circular with passaavant ridge

 

     Pressure-flow measurements(Aerodynamic)

     fMRI

     Spectography

     Accelerometry

 

 

 

 

Table 4. Data analysis

 

Speech assessment

Pressure-flow measurements(Aerodynamic)

 

fMRI

total

NE

 

 

 

 

MVF

 

 

 

 

Accuracy different